<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />

    {{Shortcut|WP:COINDESK}}
<!-- TODO: Add DISPLAYTITLE back when generating actual pages, with correct URL -->
<!-- {{DISPLAYTITLE:Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/''CoinDesk''}} -->
{{Infobox
| title            = [[CoinDesk]]
| image            = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2           = source type
| data2            = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3           = publisher
| data3            = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5           = website
| data5            = 
| label6           = classification
| data6            = [[File:Argentina - NO symbol.svg|20px|Generally unreliable|link=]] Generally unreliable: Editors show consensus that the source is [[WP:QUESTIONABLE|questionable]] in most cases.
}}

There is consensus that CoinDesk should not be used to establish [[WP:N|notability]] for article topics, and that it should be avoided in favor of more mainstream sources. Check CoinDesk articles for [[conflict of interest]] disclosures, and verify whether their parent company at the time (previously [[Digital Currency Group]], now Bullion) has an ownership stake in a company covered by CoinDesk.<ref>{{cite news|accessdate=November 21, 2018|title=Our Portfolio|url=https://dcg.co/portfolio/|website=Digital Currency Group|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180823172706/https://dcg.co/portfolio/|archive-date=August 23, 2018|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref>

== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

<blockquote>''Please add links to other significant discussions.  When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''</blockquote>

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 190#CoinDesk]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 212#CoinDesk and CoinTelegraph on the article Ethereum]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 236#CoinDesk]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 395#Time to reconsider CoinDesk]]

* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''

{{DEFAULTSORT:CoinDesk, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gu" id="CoinDesk"
| [[CoinDesk]] {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:COINDESK}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu}}
| {{rsnl|251|RfC on use of CoinDesk|2018|rfc=y}} {{rsnl|273|RfC - CoinDesk as a source|2019|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2023|}}
| There is consensus that CoinDesk should not be used to establish [[WP:N|notability]] for article topics, and that it should be avoided in favor of more mainstream sources. Check CoinDesk articles for [[conflict of interest]] disclosures, and verify whether their parent company at the time (previously [[Digital Currency Group]], now Bullion) has an ownership stake in a company covered by CoinDesk.<ref>{{cite news|accessdate=November 21, 2018|title=Our Portfolio|url=https://dcg.co/portfolio/|website=Digital Currency Group|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180823172706/https://dcg.co/portfolio/|archive-date=August 23, 2018|url-status=live|df=mdy-all}}</ref>
| {{WP:RSPUSES|coindesk.com}}
|}