<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />

    {{Shortcut|WP:COSMOPOLITAN}}
<!-- TODO: Add DISPLAYTITLE back when generating actual pages, with correct URL -->
<!-- {{DISPLAYTITLE:Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/''Cosmopolitan (magazine)''}} -->
{{Infobox
| title            = [[Cosmopolitan (magazine)]]
| image            = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2           = source type
| data2            = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3           = publisher
| data3            = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5           = website
| data5            = 
| label6           = classification
| data6            = [[File:Achtung-orange.svg|20px|No consensus|link=]] No consensus, unclear, or additional considerations apply
}}

There is no consensus on the reliability of ''Cosmopolitan''. It is generally regarded as a situational source, which means context is important. The treatment of ''Cosmopolitan'' as a source should be decided on a case-by-case basis, depending on the article and the information to be verified.

== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

<blockquote>''Please add links to other significant discussions.  When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''</blockquote>

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 3#IMDb Publicity]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 109#Tell me if I'm in the right place]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 225#Usage of "serious" articles from Buzzfeed, Teen Vogue, and Cosmopolitan]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 249#Threesome]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 256#Is Cosmopolitan a reliable source?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 501#Cosmopolitan's 30 Best TV Shows of All Time]]

* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''

{{DEFAULTSORT:Cosmopolitan (magazine), Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-nc" id="Cosmopolitan"
| ''[[Cosmopolitan (magazine)|Cosmopolitan]]'' {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:COSMOPOLITAN}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|nc}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 3#IMDb Publicity|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 109#Tell me if I'm in the right place|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 225#Usage of "serious" articles from Buzzfeed, Teen Vogue, and Cosmopolitan|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 249#Threesome|4]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 256#Is Cosmopolitan a reliable source?|5]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 501#Cosmopolitan's 30 Best TV Shows of All Time|6]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2025}}
| There is no consensus on the reliability of ''Cosmopolitan''. It is generally regarded as a situational source, which means context is important. The treatment of ''Cosmopolitan'' as a source should be decided on a case-by-case basis, depending on the article and the information to be verified.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|cosmopolitan.com}}
|}