{{Shortcut|WP:COUNTERPUNCH}}
{{Infobox
| title = [[CounterPunch]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Argentina - NO symbol.svg|20px|Generally unreliable|link=]] Generally unreliable: Editors show consensus that the source is [[WP:QUESTIONABLE|questionable]] in most cases.
}}
''CounterPunch'' is a left-wing political opinion magazine. Despite the fact that the publication has an editorial board, there is no effective editorial control over the content of the publication, so articles should be treated as [[WP:SPS|self-published sources]]. As a consequence, the articles should generally be avoided and should not be used to establish [[WP:N|notability]] unless published by subject-matter experts writing about subjects within their domain of expertise, in which case they may be considered reliable for facts. Citing ''CounterPunch'' for third-party claims about [[WP:BLP|living persons]] is [[WP:BLPSPS|not allowed]]. All articles on ''CounterPunch'' must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, in particular for [[WP:DUE|due weight]], and opinions must be [[WP:INTEXT|attributed]]. Some articles in the publication promote conspiracy theories and historical [[denialism]], but there was no consensus to deprecate the outlet based on the most recent RfC.
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:CounterPunch, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gu" id="CounterPunch"
| ''[[CounterPunch]]'' {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:COUNTERPUNCH}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu}}
| {{rsnl|355|RfC: CounterPunch|2021|rfc=y}} {{rsnl|367|Deprecation RfC: CounterPunch|2022|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2022}}
| ''CounterPunch'' is a left-wing political opinion magazine. Despite the fact that the publication has an editorial board, there is no effective editorial control over the content of the publication, so articles should be treated as [[WP:SPS|self-published sources]]. As a consequence, the articles should generally be avoided and should not be used to establish [[WP:N|notability]] unless published by subject-matter experts writing about subjects within their domain of expertise, in which case they may be considered reliable for facts. Citing ''CounterPunch'' for third-party claims about [[WP:BLP|living persons]] is [[WP:BLPSPS|not allowed]]. All articles on ''CounterPunch'' must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, in particular for [[WP:DUE|due weight]], and opinions must be [[WP:INTEXT|attributed]]. Some articles in the publication promote conspiracy theories and historical [[denialism]], but there was no consensus to deprecate the outlet based on the most recent RfC.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|counterpunch.org|counterpunch.com}}
|}