{{Shortcut|WP:RSPDM}}
{{Infobox
| title = [[Daily Mail]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label1 = other names
| data1 = MailOnline
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Stop hand.svg|20px|Deprecated|link=]] '''Deprecated''': There is community consensus to [[WP:DEPS|deprecate]] the source.
}}
In the 2017 RfC, the ''Daily Mail'' was the first source to be deprecated on Wikipedia, and the decision was challenged and reaffirmed in the 2019 RfC. There is consensus that the ''Daily Mail'' (including its online version, ''[[MailOnline]]'') is generally unreliable, and its use as a reference is generally prohibited, especially when other sources exist that are more reliable. As a result, the ''Daily Mail'' should not be used for determining notability, nor should it be used as a source in articles. The ''Daily Mail'' has a "reputation for poor fact checking, sensationalism, and flat-out fabrication". The ''Daily Mail'' may be used in rare cases in an [[WP:ABOUTSELF|about-self fashion]]. Some editors regard the ''Daily Mail'' as reliable historically, so old articles may be used in a historical context. (Note that dailymail.co.uk is not trustworthy as a source of past content that was printed in the ''Daily Mail''.) The restriction is often incorrectly interpreted as a "ban" on the ''Daily Mail''. The deprecation includes other editions of the UK ''Daily Mail'', such as the Irish and Scottish editions. The UK ''Daily Mail'' is not to be confused with [[Daily Mail (disambiguation)|other publications named ''Daily Mail'']] that are unaffiliated with the UK paper. The dailymail.com domain was previously used by the unaffiliated ''[[Charleston Daily Mail]]'', and reference links to that publication are still present.
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:Daily Mail, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-d" id="Daily Mail"
| ''[[Daily Mail]]'' ([[MailOnline]]) {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:DAILYMAIL}} {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:RSPDM}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|d}}
| {{rsnl|220|Daily Mail RfC|2017|rfc=y}} {{rsnl|255|2nd RfC: The Daily Mail|2019|rfc=y}} {{rsnl|299|(Infomercial voice) But Wait! There's still more!! (News about The Daily Mail)|2020|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2024}}
| In the 2017 RfC, the ''Daily Mail'' was the first source to be deprecated on Wikipedia, and the decision was challenged and reaffirmed in the 2019 RfC. There is consensus that the ''Daily Mail'' (including its online version, ''[[MailOnline]]'') is generally unreliable, and its use as a reference is generally prohibited, especially when other sources exist that are more reliable. As a result, the ''Daily Mail'' should not be used for determining notability, nor should it be used as a source in articles. The ''Daily Mail'' has a "reputation for poor fact checking, sensationalism, and flat-out fabrication". The ''Daily Mail'' may be used in rare cases in an [[WP:ABOUTSELF|about-self fashion]]. Some editors regard the ''Daily Mail'' as reliable historically, so old articles may be used in a historical context. (Note that dailymail.co.uk is not trustworthy as a source of past content that was printed in the ''Daily Mail''.) The restriction is often incorrectly interpreted as a "ban" on the ''Daily Mail''. The deprecation includes other editions of the UK ''Daily Mail'', such as the Irish and Scottish editions. The UK ''Daily Mail'' is not to be confused with [[Daily Mail (disambiguation)|other publications named ''Daily Mail'']] that are unaffiliated with the UK paper. The dailymail.com domain was previously used by the unaffiliated ''[[Charleston Daily Mail]]'', and reference links to that publication are still present.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|dailymail.co.uk|thisismoney.co.uk|pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail|pressreader.com/uk/scottish-daily-mail|pressreader.com/ireland/irish-daily-mail|mailplus.co.uk|dailym.ai|dailymail.com.au|travelmail.co.uk|mailonline.pressreader.com|dailymail.com}}
|}