{{Shortcut|WP:DESTRUCTOID}}
{{Infobox
| title = [[Destructoid]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Achtung-orange.svg|20px|No consensus|link=]] No consensus, unclear, or additional considerations apply
}}
There is a consensus that ''Destructoid'' is marginally reliable for topics on video games. As a site featuring articles written mainly by freelance journalists, consider whether the author is trusted before using ''Destructoid'' as a source in articles. ''Destructoid'' may still be used for video game reviews given that attribution is provided.
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Archive 36#Destructoid]]
* [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 2#Destructoid.com]]
* [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 6#Destructoid editorial review process?]]
* [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Archive 116#Situational Sources]]
* [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 17#Destructoid staff/community post separation]]
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:Destructoid, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-nc" id="Destructoid"
| ''[[Destructoid]]'' {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:DESTRUCTOID}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|nc}}
| [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Archive 36#Destructoid|A]] [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 2#Destructoid.com|B]] [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 6#Destructoid editorial review process?|C]] [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Archive 116#Situational Sources|D]] [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 17#Destructoid staff/community post separation|E]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2017}}
| There is a consensus that ''Destructoid'' is marginally reliable for topics on video games. As a site featuring articles written mainly by freelance journalists, consider whether the author is trusted before using ''Destructoid'' as a source in articles. ''Destructoid'' may still be used for video game reviews given that attribution is provided.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|destructoid.com}}
|}