{{Shortcut|WP:DESTRUCTOID}} {{Infobox | title = [[Destructoid]] | image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)'' | label2 = source type | data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)'' | label3 = publisher | data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)'' | label5 = website | data5 = | label6 = classification | data6 = [[File:Achtung-orange.svg|20px|No consensus|link=]] No consensus, unclear, or additional considerations apply }} There is a consensus that ''Destructoid'' is marginally reliable for topics on video games. As a site featuring articles written mainly by freelance journalists, consider whether the author is trusted before using ''Destructoid'' as a source in articles. ''Destructoid'' may still be used for video game reviews given that attribution is provided. == Prior discussions == {{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Archive 36#Destructoid]] * [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 2#Destructoid.com]] * [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 6#Destructoid editorial review process?]] * [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Archive 116#Situational Sources]] * [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 17#Destructoid staff/community post separation]] * Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD''' {{DEFAULTSORT:Destructoid, Perennial sources}} ==Notes== {{notelist}} ==References== == Original table row for comparison == ''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)'' {{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}} |- class="s-nc" id="Destructoid" | ''[[Destructoid]]'' {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:DESTRUCTOID}} | {{WP:RSPSTATUS|nc}} | [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Archive 36#Destructoid|A]] [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 2#Destructoid.com|B]] [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 6#Destructoid editorial review process?|C]] [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Archive 116#Situational Sources|D]] [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 17#Destructoid staff/community post separation|E]] | {{WP:RSPLAST|2017}} | There is a consensus that ''Destructoid'' is marginally reliable for topics on video games. As a site featuring articles written mainly by freelance journalists, consider whether the author is trusted before using ''Destructoid'' as a source in articles. ''Destructoid'' may still be used for video game reviews given that attribution is provided. | {{WP:RSPUSES|destructoid.com}} |}