{{Shortcut|WP:RSPFACEBOOK}}
{{Infobox
| title = [[Facebook]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label1 = other names
| data1 = Meta
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Argentina - NO symbol.svg|20px|Generally unreliable|link=]] Generally unreliable: Editors show consensus that the source is [[WP:QUESTIONABLE|questionable]] in most cases.
}}
Facebook is considered generally unreliable because it is a [[WP:self-published source|self-published source]] with no editorial oversight. In the 2020 RfC, there was consensus to add an [[WP:EF|edit filter]] to warn users who attempt to cite Facebook as a source, and no consensus on whether Facebook citations should be automatically reverted with {{u|XLinkBot}}.
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:Facebook, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gu" id="Facebook"
| [[Facebook]] (Meta) {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:RSPFB}} {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:RSPFACEBOOK}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu}}
| {{rsnl|299|RfC: Facebook|2020|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2026}}
| Facebook is considered generally unreliable because it is a [[WP:self-published source|self-published source]] with no editorial oversight. In the 2020 RfC, there was consensus to add an [[WP:EF|edit filter]] to warn users who attempt to cite Facebook as a source, and no consensus on whether Facebook citations should be automatically reverted with {{u|XLinkBot}}.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|facebook.com}}
|}