{{Shortcut|WP:FAROUT}}
{{Infobox
| title = [[Far Out]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Argentina - NO symbol.svg|20px|Generally unreliable|link=]] Generally unreliable: Editors show consensus that the source is [[WP:QUESTIONABLE|questionable]] in most cases.
}}
''Far Out'' is considered generally unreliable as a [[churnalism]] outlet that appears to engage in [[WP:CIRCULAR|circular sourcing]].
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 464#Far Out Magazine]]
* [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 76#Source: Far Out]]
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:Far Out, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gu" id="Far Out"
| ''Far Out''{{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:FAROUT}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 464#Far Out Magazine|1]]
[[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 76#Source: Far Out|A]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2025|stale=n}}
| ''Far Out'' is considered generally unreliable as a [[churnalism]] outlet that appears to engage in [[WP:CIRCULAR|circular sourcing]].
| {{WP:RSPUSES|faroutmagazine.co.uk}}
|}