<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />

    {{Shortcut|WP:GAWKER}}
<!-- TODO: Add DISPLAYTITLE back when generating actual pages, with correct URL -->
<!-- {{DISPLAYTITLE:Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/''Gawker''}} -->
{{Infobox
| title            = [[Gawker]]
| image            = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2           = source type
| data2            = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3           = publisher
| data3            = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5           = website
| data5            = 
| label6           = classification
| data6            = [[File:Argentina - NO symbol.svg|20px|Generally unreliable|link=]] Generally unreliable: Editors show consensus that the source is [[WP:QUESTIONABLE|questionable]] in most cases.
}}

Gawker (2002–2016) was a gossip blog that frequently published articles on rumors and speculation without named authors. When Gawker is the only source for a piece of information, the information would likely constitute [[WP:DUE|undue weight]], especially when the subject is a [[WP:BLP|living person]]. When another reliable source quotes information from Gawker, it is preferable to cite that source instead. In the 2019 RfC, there was no consensus on whether Gawker should be deprecated. In 2021, the publication was relaunched under Bustle Digital Group, and subsequently closed in 2023. The second incarnation has not been discussed at RSN.

== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

<blockquote>''Please add links to other significant discussions.  When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''</blockquote>

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 16#Huffington Post, Gawker and About.com]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 37#Gawker.com]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 77#Is Gawker a reliable source?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 152#Is Gawker a reliable source?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 180#Media as RS for their own controversies (GamerGate)]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 220#Impact assessment ?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221#Can we have clearer guidance on what sort of sourcing from the Mail is and isn't OK?]]

* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''

{{DEFAULTSORT:Gawker, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gu" id="Gawker"
| [[Gawker]] {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:GAWKER}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu}}
| {{rsnl|262|RfC: Gawker|2019|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2019|stale=n}}
| Gawker (2002–2016) was a gossip blog that frequently published articles on rumors and speculation without named authors. When Gawker is the only source for a piece of information, the information would likely constitute [[WP:DUE|undue weight]], especially when the subject is a [[WP:BLP|living person]]. When another reliable source quotes information from Gawker, it is preferable to cite that source instead. In the 2019 RfC, there was no consensus on whether Gawker should be deprecated. In 2021, the publication was relaunched under Bustle Digital Group, and subsequently closed in 2023. The second incarnation has not been discussed at RSN.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|gawker.com}}
|}