<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />

    {{Shortcut|WP:GIZMODO}}
<!-- TODO: Add DISPLAYTITLE back when generating actual pages, with correct URL -->
<!-- {{DISPLAYTITLE:Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/''Gizmodo''}} -->
{{Infobox
| title            = [[Gizmodo]]
| image            = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2           = source type
| data2            = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3           = publisher
| data3            = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5           = website
| data5            = 
| label6           = classification
| data6            = [[File:Yes Check Circle.svg|20px]] Usually reliable for typical purposes
}}

There is consensus that ''Gizmodo'' is generally reliable for technology, popular culture, and entertainment. There is no consensus on whether it is generally reliable for controversial statements. There is consensus that AI-generated articles are generally ''un''reliable; ''Gizmodo''{{'s}} parent company, G/O Media, began releasing such pieces in July 2023, usually under the byline "Gizmodo Bot".<ref>{{cite news |last1=Davis |first1=Wes |title=Gizmodo's staff isn't happy about G/O Media's AI-generated content |url=https://www.theverge.com/2023/7/8/23788162/gizmodo-g-o-media-ai-generated-articles-star-wars |access-date=February 27, 2024 |work=[[The Verge]] |date=July 8, 2023|language=en}}</ref>

== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

<blockquote>''Please add links to other significant discussions.  When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''</blockquote>

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221#paleofuture.gizmodo.com in Napoleon Hill]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 270#Is Gizmodo considered a reliable source?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 346#Some reliable sources]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 409#G/O Media to start using AI]]

* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''

{{DEFAULTSORT:Gizmodo, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="Gizmodo"
| ''[[Gizmodo]]'' {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:GIZMODO}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221#paleofuture.gizmodo.com in Napoleon Hill|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 270#Is Gizmodo considered a reliable source?|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 346#Some reliable sources|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 409#G/O Media to start using AI|4]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2023}}
| There is consensus that ''Gizmodo'' is generally reliable for technology, popular culture, and entertainment. There is no consensus on whether it is generally reliable for controversial statements. There is consensus that AI-generated articles are generally ''un''reliable; ''Gizmodo''{{'s}} parent company, G/O Media, began releasing such pieces in July 2023, usually under the byline "Gizmodo Bot".<ref>{{cite news |last1=Davis |first1=Wes |title=Gizmodo's staff isn't happy about G/O Media's AI-generated content |url=https://www.theverge.com/2023/7/8/23788162/gizmodo-g-o-media-ai-generated-articles-star-wars |access-date=February 27, 2024 |work=[[The Verge]] |date=July 8, 2023|language=en}}</ref>
| {{WP:RSPUSES|gizmodo.com}}
|}