{{Shortcut|WP:HAARETZ}}
{{Infobox
| title = [[Haaretz]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label1 = other names
| data1 = Ḥadashot Ha'aretz
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Yes Check Circle.svg|20px]] Usually reliable for typical purposes
}}
''Haaretz'' is considered generally reliable. Some editors believe that ''Haaretz'' reports with a political slant, particularly with respect to the [[Arab–Israeli conflict]], which makes it [[WP:BIASED|biased or opinionated]]. The publication's opinion pieces should be handled with [[WP:RSOPINION|the appropriate guideline]].
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:Haaretz, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="Haaretz"
| ''[[Haaretz]]'' (''Ḥadashot Ha'aretz'') {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:HAARETZ}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| 11{{efn|See these discussions of ''Haaretz'':
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2025}}
| ''Haaretz'' is considered generally reliable. Some editors believe that ''Haaretz'' reports with a political slant, particularly with respect to the [[Arab–Israeli conflict]], which makes it [[WP:BIASED|biased or opinionated]]. The publication's opinion pieces should be handled with [[WP:RSOPINION|the appropriate guideline]].
| {{WP:RSPUSES|haaretz.com|haaretz.co.il}}
|}