{{Shortcut|WP:HUFFPOCON}}
{{Infobox
| title = [[HuffPost]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label1 = other names
| data1 = The Huffington Post
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Argentina - NO symbol.svg|20px|Generally unreliable|link=]] Generally unreliable: Editors show consensus that the source is [[WP:QUESTIONABLE|questionable]] in most cases.
}}
Until 2018, the U.S. edition of ''HuffPost'' published content written by contributors with near-zero editorial oversight. These contributors generally did not have a reputation for fact-checking, and most editors consider them highly variable in quality. Editors show consensus for treating ''HuffPost'' contributor articles as [[WP:SPS|self-published sources]], unless the article was written by a [[WP:EXPERTSOURCE|subject-matter expert]]. ''HuffPost'' contributor articles should never be used for [[WP:THIRDPARTY|third-party claims]] about [[WP:BLPSPS|living persons]]. In 2018, ''HuffPost'' discontinued its contributor platform, but old contributor articles are still online. Check the [[byline]] to determine whether an article is written by a staff member or a "Contributor" (also referred to as an "Editorial Partner"). ''See also: [[#HuffPost|HuffPost (excluding politics)]], {{pslink|HuffPost (politics)}}.''
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:HuffPost, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gu" id="HuffPost contributors"
| ''[[HuffPost]]'' contributors (''The Huffington Post'') {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:HUFFPOCON}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu}}
| {{rsnl|313|RFC: HuffPost|2020|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2020|stale=n}}
| Until 2018, the U.S. edition of ''HuffPost'' published content written by contributors with near-zero editorial oversight. These contributors generally did not have a reputation for fact-checking, and most editors consider them highly variable in quality. Editors show consensus for treating ''HuffPost'' contributor articles as [[WP:SPS|self-published sources]], unless the article was written by a [[WP:EXPERTSOURCE|subject-matter expert]]. ''HuffPost'' contributor articles should never be used for [[WP:THIRDPARTY|third-party claims]] about [[WP:BLPSPS|living persons]]. In 2018, ''HuffPost'' discontinued its contributor platform, but old contributor articles are still online. Check the [[byline]] to determine whether an article is written by a staff member or a "Contributor" (also referred to as an "Editorial Partner"). ''See also: [[#HuffPost|HuffPost (excluding politics)]], {{pslink|HuffPost (politics)}}.''
| {{WP:RSPUSES|huffpost.com|huffingtonpost.com}}
|}