<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />

    {{Shortcut|WP:HUFFPOST}}
<!-- TODO: Add DISPLAYTITLE back when generating actual pages, with correct URL -->
<!-- {{DISPLAYTITLE:Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/''HuffPost''}} -->
{{Infobox
| title            = [[HuffPost]]
| image            = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label1           = other names
| data1            = The Huffington Post
| label2           = source type
| data2            = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3           = publisher
| data3            = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5           = website
| data5            = 
| label6           = classification
| data6            = [[File:Yes Check Circle.svg|20px]] Usually reliable for typical purposes
}}

A 2020 RfC found ''HuffPost'' staff writers fairly reliable for factual reporting on non-political topics, but notes that they may give prominence to topics that support their political [[WP:BIASED|bias]] and less prominence to, or omit, things that contradict it. ''HuffPost''{{'}}s reliability has increased since 2012; articles before 2012 are less reliable and should be treated with more caution. ''HuffPost'' uses [[clickbait]] headlines to attract attention to its articles, thus the body text of any ''HuffPost'' article is considered more reliable than its [[WP:HEADLINE|headline]]. ''See also: {{pslink|HuffPost (politics)}}, {{pslink|HuffPost contributors}}.''

== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

<blockquote>''Please add links to other significant discussions.  When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''</blockquote>


* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''

{{DEFAULTSORT:HuffPost, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="HuffPost"
| ''[[HuffPost]]'' (excluding politics) <small>(''The Huffington Post'')</small> {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:HUFF}} {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:HUFFPOST}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| {{rsnl|313|RFC: HuffPost|2020|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2021}}
| A 2020 RfC found ''HuffPost'' staff writers fairly reliable for factual reporting on non-political topics, but notes that they may give prominence to topics that support their political [[WP:BIASED|bias]] and less prominence to, or omit, things that contradict it. ''HuffPost''{{'}}s reliability has increased since 2012; articles before 2012 are less reliable and should be treated with more caution. ''HuffPost'' uses [[clickbait]] headlines to attract attention to its articles, thus the body text of any ''HuffPost'' article is considered more reliable than its [[WP:HEADLINE|headline]]. ''See also: {{pslink|HuffPost (politics)}}, {{pslink|HuffPost contributors}}.''
| {{WP:RSPUSES|huffpost.com|huffingtonpost.com|huffingtonpost.co.uk|huffingtonpost.ca|huffingtonpost.com.au|huffpostbrasil.com|huffingtonpost.de|huffingtonpost.es|huffingtonpost.fr|huffingtonpost.gr|huffingtonpost.in|huffingtonpost.it|huffingtonpost.jp|huffingtonpost.kr|huffpostmaghreb.com|huffingtonpost.com.mx}}
|}