<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />

    {{Shortcut|WP:IBTIMES}}
<!-- TODO: Add DISPLAYTITLE back when generating actual pages, with correct URL -->
<!-- {{DISPLAYTITLE:Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/''International Business Times''}} -->
{{Infobox
| title            = [[International Business Times]]
| image            = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label1           = other names
| data1            = IBT, IBTimes
| label2           = source type
| data2            = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3           = publisher
| data3            = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5           = website
| data5            = 
| label6           = classification
| data6            = [[File:Argentina - NO symbol.svg|20px|Generally unreliable|link=]] Generally unreliable: Editors show consensus that the source is [[WP:QUESTIONABLE|questionable]] in most cases.
}}

There is consensus that the ''International Business Times'' is generally unreliable. Editors note that the publication's editorial practices have been criticized by other reliable sources, and point to the inconsistent quality of the site's articles. The site's [[WP:SYNDICATED|syndicated content]], which may not be clearly marked, should be evaluated by the reliability of its original publisher.

== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

<blockquote>''Please add links to other significant discussions.  When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''</blockquote>

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 83#Times and IBTimes RS?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 104#International Business Times]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 195#Slate, WGN, International Business Times]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 218#International Business Times as a reliable source?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 222#International Business Times]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 262#International Business Times]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 262#Use of blogs for sourcing height in BLPs]]

* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''

{{DEFAULTSORT:International Business Times, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gu" id="International Business Times"
| ''[[International Business Times]]'' <small>(''IBT'', ''IBTimes'')</small> {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:IBTIMES}} {{anchor|IBTIMES}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 83#Times and IBTimes RS?|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 104#International Business Times|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 195#Slate, WGN, International Business Times|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 218#International Business Times as a reliable source?|4]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 222#International Business Times|5]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 262#International Business Times|6]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 262#Use of blogs for sourcing height in BLPs|7]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2019|stale=n}}
| There is consensus that the ''International Business Times'' is generally unreliable. Editors note that the publication's editorial practices have been criticized by other reliable sources, and point to the inconsistent quality of the site's articles. The site's [[WP:SYNDICATED|syndicated content]], which may not be clearly marked, should be evaluated by the reliability of its original publisher.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|ibtimes.com|ibtimes.com.au|ibtimes.com.cn|ibtimes.co.in|ibtimes.sg|ibtimes.co.uk}}
|}