<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />

    {{Shortcut|WP:JEZEBEL}}
<!-- TODO: Add DISPLAYTITLE back when generating actual pages, with correct URL -->
<!-- {{DISPLAYTITLE:Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/''Jezebel (website)''}} -->
{{Infobox
| title            = [[Jezebel (website)]]
| image            = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2           = source type
| data2            = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3           = publisher
| data3            = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5           = website
| data5            = 
| label6           = classification
| data6            = [[File:Achtung-orange.svg|20px|No consensus|link=]] No consensus, unclear, or additional considerations apply
}}

There is no consensus on the reliability of ''Jezebel''. Most editors believe that ''Jezebel'' is [[WP:BIASED|biased or opinionated]], and that its claims should be [[WP:INTEXT|attributed]]. ''Jezebel'' should generally not be used for contentious claims, especially ones about [[WP:BLP|living persons]]. The website shut down in November 2023 but was relaunched in December 2023.

== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

<blockquote>''Please add links to other significant discussions.  When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''</blockquote>

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 149#FetLife]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 209#Is Jezebel.com (online news magazine) an RS?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 401#Do the actions of a Jezebel writer reflect on the source?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 409#G/O Media to start using AI]]

* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''

{{DEFAULTSORT:Jezebel (website), Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-nc" id="Jezebel"
| ''[[Jezebel (website)|Jezebel]]'' {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:JEZEBEL}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|nc}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 149#FetLife|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 209#Is Jezebel.com (online news magazine) an RS?|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 401#Do the actions of a Jezebel writer reflect on the source?|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 409#G/O Media to start using AI|4]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2023}}
| There is no consensus on the reliability of ''Jezebel''. Most editors believe that ''Jezebel'' is [[WP:BIASED|biased or opinionated]], and that its claims should be [[WP:INTEXT|attributed]]. ''Jezebel'' should generally not be used for contentious claims, especially ones about [[WP:BLP|living persons]]. The website shut down in November 2023 but was relaunched in December 2023.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|jezebel.com}}
|}