{{Infobox
| title = [[La Patilla]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Achtung-orange.svg|20px|No consensus|link=]] No consensus, unclear, or additional considerations apply
}}
''La Patilla'' is considered marginally reliable as a news source covering Venezuela, with several additional considerations. Aggregated content should not be used at all. Avoid referencing articles on ''La Patilla'' that themselves reference unreliable sources, as editors have concerns about editorial oversight in such cases. Editors note a clear [[WP:BIASED|political bias]], be extremely cautious in referencing coverage of politics. Some editors note that the bias may also affect choice of topics. Avoid use in [[WP:GS|contentious topics]], e.g. COVID-19. Avoid for controversial [[WP:BLP]] claims.
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* [[Talk:La Patilla#RfC: Reliability of La Patilla]]
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:Patilla, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-nc" id="La Patilla"
| data-sort-value="Patilla" | ''[[La Patilla]]''
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|nc}}
| {{rsnl|415|RfC: Reliability of La Patilla|2023|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2023}}
| ''La Patilla'' is considered marginally reliable as a news source covering Venezuela, with several additional considerations. Aggregated content should not be used at all. Avoid referencing articles on ''La Patilla'' that themselves reference unreliable sources, as editors have concerns about editorial oversight in such cases. Editors note a clear [[WP:BIASED|political bias]], be extremely cautious in referencing coverage of politics. Some editors note that the bias may also affect choice of topics. Avoid use in [[WP:GS|contentious topics]], e.g. COVID-19. Avoid for controversial [[WP:BLP]] claims.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|lapatilla.com}}
|}