{{Shortcut|WP:MASHABLE}}
{{Infobox
| title = [[Mashable]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Achtung-orange.svg|20px|No consensus|link=]] No consensus, unclear, or additional considerations apply
}}
In a 2021 RfC, editors achieved a consensus that while non-sponsored content from Mashable is generally fine, Mashable tends towards less formal writing and is geared at a particular niche (tech news and pop culture). As such, non-sponsored content should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, especially if the subject matter is outside of Mashable's usual focus.
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 4#Techblogs]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 16#Blogs?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 41#Mashable.com as a reference for Facebook]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 88#Blogs as sources]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 240#Request: RS check on BLP]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 264#Reliability of sources that put affiliate links in their reviews]]
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:Mashable, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-nc" id="Mashable"
| [[Mashable]] (non-sponsored content) {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:MASHABLE}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|nc}}
| {{rsnl|334|Mashable|2021|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2021}}
| In a 2021 RfC, editors achieved a consensus that while non-sponsored content from Mashable is generally fine, Mashable tends towards less formal writing and is geared at a particular niche (tech news and pop culture). As such, non-sponsored content should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, especially if the subject matter is outside of Mashable's usual focus.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|mashable.com}}
|}