{{Shortcut|WP:MOTHERJONES}}
{{Infobox
| title = [[Mother Jones (magazine)]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label1 = other names
| data1 = MoJo
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Yes Check Circle.svg|20px]] Usually reliable for typical purposes
}}
There is consensus that ''Mother Jones'' is generally reliable. Almost all editors consider ''Mother Jones'' a [[WP:BIASED|biased source]], so its statements (particularly on political topics) may need to be [[WP:INTEXT|attributed]]. Consider whether content from this publication constitutes [[WP:DUE|due weight]] before citing it in an article.
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 132#%5BMother Jones and Rolling Stone articles as RS sources in a BLP for a contentious claim]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 149#Opinion column by Stephanie Mencimer in Mother Jones]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 188#Buzzfeed, Mother Jones for BLP's.]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 229#Is Mother Jones magazine a reliable source for investigative reporting?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 274#Does this Mother Jones article accurately summarize the arguments made by the PragerU videos it cites?]]
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:Mother Jones (magazine), Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="Mother Jones"
| ''[[Mother Jones (magazine)|Mother Jones]]'' (''MoJo'') {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:MOTHERJONES}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 132#%5BMother Jones and Rolling Stone articles as RS sources in a BLP for a contentious claim|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 149#Opinion column by Stephanie Mencimer in Mother Jones|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 188#Buzzfeed, Mother Jones for BLP's.|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 229#Is Mother Jones magazine a reliable source for investigative reporting?|4]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 274#Does this Mother Jones article accurately summarize the arguments made by the PragerU videos it cites?|5]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2019}}
| There is consensus that ''Mother Jones'' is generally reliable. Almost all editors consider ''Mother Jones'' a [[WP:BIASED|biased source]], so its statements (particularly on political topics) may need to be [[WP:INTEXT|attributed]]. Consider whether content from this publication constitutes [[WP:DUE|due weight]] before citing it in an article.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|motherjones.com}}
|}