{{Shortcut|WP:RSPNME}}
{{Infobox
| title = [[NME]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label1 = other names
| data1 = New Musical Express
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Yes Check Circle.svg|20px]] Usually reliable for typical purposes
}}
There is consensus that British publication ''NME'' is generally reliable for content related to its areas of expertise, which include music.
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 26#Rolling Stone, NME, Popmatters and Metal-Observer]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 318#New Musical Express / NME / www.nme.com]]
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:NME, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="NME"
| ''[[NME]]'' (''New Musical Express'') {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:RSPNME}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 26#Rolling Stone, NME, Popmatters and Metal-Observer|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 318#New Musical Express / NME / www.nme.com|2]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2020}}
| There is consensus that British publication ''NME'' is generally reliable for content related to its areas of expertise, which include music.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|nme.com}}
|}