{{Shortcut|WP:NATGEO}}
{{Infobox
| title = [[National Geographic]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label1 = other names
| data1 = The National Geographic Magazine, Nat Geo
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Yes Check Circle.svg|20px]] Usually reliable for typical purposes
}}
There is consensus that ''National Geographic'' is generally reliable. For coverage by ''National Geographic'' of [[WP:FRINGE|fringe]] topics and ideas, [[WP:DUE|due weight]] and [[WP:PARITY|parity of sources]] should be considered.
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 126#National Geographic]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 240#National Geographic website, Krampus, and Hel]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 313#National Geographic and Adam Weishaupt (the Illuminati guy)]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 408#National Geographic]]
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:National Geographic, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="National Geographic"
| ''[[National Geographic]]'' (''The National Geographic Magazine'', ''Nat Geo'') {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:NATGEO}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 126#National Geographic|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 240#National Geographic website, Krampus, and Hel|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 313#National Geographic and Adam Weishaupt (the Illuminati guy)|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 408#National Geographic|4]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2023}}
| There is consensus that ''National Geographic'' is generally reliable. For coverage by ''National Geographic'' of [[WP:FRINGE|fringe]] topics and ideas, [[WP:DUE|due weight]] and [[WP:PARITY|parity of sources]] should be considered.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|nationalgeographic.com}}
|}