<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />

    {{Shortcut|WP:RSPVULTURE}}
<!-- TODO: Add DISPLAYTITLE back when generating actual pages, with correct URL -->
<!-- {{DISPLAYTITLE:Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/''New York (magazine)''}} -->
{{Infobox
| title            = [[New York (magazine)]]
| image            = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label1           = other names
| data1            = Vulture, The Cut, Grub Street, Daily Intelligencer
| label2           = source type
| data2            = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3           = publisher
| data3            = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5           = website
| data5            = 
| label6           = classification
| data6            = [[File:Yes Check Circle.svg|20px]] Usually reliable for typical purposes
}}

There is consensus that ''New York'' magazine, including its subsidiary website ''Vulture'', is generally reliable. There is no consensus on whether it is generally reliable for contentious statements. ''See also: {{pslink|Polygon (pre-2025)}}, {{pslink|The Verge}}, {{pslink|Vox}}''

== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

<blockquote>''Please add links to other significant discussions.  When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''</blockquote>

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 63#David Lynch Foundation]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 159#Vulture.com]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 187#Unreliable Sources used in the GamerGate Article]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 216#New York Magazine/"New Journalism"]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 327#Are New York Magazine and Infection Control Today reliable sources for the idea that COVID-19 leaked from a Chinese lab?]]

* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''

{{DEFAULTSORT:New York (magazine), Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="New York"
| {{anchor|Vulture|Intelligencer}} ''[[New York (magazine)|New York]]'' <small>(''[[Vulture (website)|Vulture]]'', ''The Cut'', ''Grub Street'', ''Daily Intelligencer'')</small> {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:RSPNEWYORK}} {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:RSPVULTURE}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 63#David Lynch Foundation|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 159#Vulture.com|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 187#Unreliable Sources used in the GamerGate Article|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 216#New York Magazine/"New Journalism"|4]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 327#Are New York Magazine and Infection Control Today reliable sources for the idea that COVID-19 leaked from a Chinese lab?|5]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2021}}
| There is consensus that ''New York'' magazine, including its subsidiary website ''Vulture'', is generally reliable. There is no consensus on whether it is generally reliable for contentious statements. ''See also: {{pslink|Polygon (pre-2025)}}, {{pslink|The Verge}}, {{pslink|Vox}}''
| {{WP:RSPUSES|nymag.com|vulture.com|thecut.com|grubstreet.com}}
|}