{{Shortcut|WP:OKO}}
{{Infobox
| title = [[OKO.press]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Yes Check Circle.svg|20px]] Usually reliable for typical purposes
}}
OKO.press is a Polish investigative journalism and fact-checking website. There is consensus that it is generally reliable in its reporting, though some editors consider it a [[WP:BIASED|biased source]].
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 328#Glaukopis journal]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 329#Gazeta Wyborcza and OKO.press]]
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:OKO.press, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="OKO.press"
| [[OKO.press]] {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:OKO}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| {{rsnl|355|Survey: OKO.press|2021|rfc=y}} {{rsnl|432|RFC: OKO.press|2024|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2024}}
| OKO.press is a Polish investigative journalism and fact-checking website. There is consensus that it is generally reliable in its reporting, though some editors consider it a [[WP:BIASED|biased source]].
| {{WP:RSPUSES|oko.press}}
|}