{{Shortcut|WP:OANN}}
{{Infobox
| title = [[One America News Network]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label1 = other names
| data1 = OANN
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Stop hand.svg|20px|Deprecated|link=]] '''Deprecated''': There is community consensus to [[WP:DEPS|deprecate]] the source.
}}
In the 2019 RfC, there was clear consensus to deprecate One America News Network as a source à la the ''{{pslink|Daily Mail}}''. Editors noted that One America News Network published a number of falsehoods, conspiracy theories, and intentionally misleading stories. One America News Network should not be used, ever, as a reference for facts, due to its unreliability. It can still be used as a [[WP:PRIMARY|primary source]] when attributing opinions, viewpoints, and commentary, meaning that it should not be used as a source outside of its own article.
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 241#One America News Network]]
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:One America News Network, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-d" id="One America News Network"
| [[One America News Network]] (OANN) {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:OANN}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|d}}
| {{rsnl|281|RfC: One America News Network|2019|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2019|stale=n}}
| In the 2019 RfC, there was clear consensus to deprecate One America News Network as a source à la the ''{{pslink|Daily Mail}}''. Editors noted that One America News Network published a number of falsehoods, conspiracy theories, and intentionally misleading stories. One America News Network should not be used, ever, as a reference for facts, due to its unreliability. It can still be used as a [[WP:PRIMARY|primary source]] when attributing opinions, viewpoints, and commentary, meaning that it should not be used as a source outside of its own article.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|oann.com}}
|}