{{Infobox
| title = [[PanAm Post]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Argentina - NO symbol.svg|20px|Generally unreliable|link=]] Generally unreliable: Editors show consensus that the source is [[WP:QUESTIONABLE|questionable]] in most cases.
}}
There is consensus that the ''PanAm Post'' is generally unreliable for factual reporting. Most editors consider the publication [[WP:BIASED|biased or opinionated]]. Some editors note that the ''PanAm Post'' is [[WP:UBO|used by other sources that are reliable]] and only believe that its opinion section should be avoided.
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:PanAm Post, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gu" id="PanAm Post"
| ''[[PanAm Post]]''
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu}}
| {{rsnl|296|RfC: PanAm Post|2020|rfc=y}} {{rsnl|418|RfC: Reliability of PanAm Post|2023|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2023}}
| There is consensus that the ''PanAm Post'' is generally unreliable for factual reporting. Most editors consider the publication [[WP:BIASED|biased or opinionated]]. Some editors note that the ''PanAm Post'' is [[WP:UBO|used by other sources that are reliable]] and only believe that its opinion section should be avoided.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|panampost.com}}
|}