{{Shortcut|WP:PEOPLEMAG}}
{{Infobox
| title = [[People (magazine)]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Yes Check Circle.svg|20px]] Usually reliable for typical purposes
}}
There is consensus that ''People'' magazine can be a reliable source in [[WP:BLP|biographies of living persons]], but the magazine should not be used for contentious claims unless supplemented with a stronger source.
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 170#Celebrity sources and distinguishing tabloid (newspaper format) from tabloid journalism]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 240#Request: RS check on BLP]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 361#Demote People magazine]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 387#People Magazine reliability?]]
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:People (magazine), Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="People"
| ''[[People (magazine)|People]]'' {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:PEOPLEMAG}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| {{rsnl|157|RfC: Is People magazine a reliable source for BLPs?|2013|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2022}}
| There is consensus that ''People'' magazine can be a reliable source in [[WP:BLP|biographies of living persons]], but the magazine should not be used for contentious claims unless supplemented with a stronger source.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|people.com}}
|}