{{Shortcut|WP:PINKNEWS}}
{{Infobox
| title = [[PinkNews]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Yes Check Circle.svg|20px]] Usually reliable for typical purposes
}}
There is rough consensus that ''[[PinkNews]]'' is ''generally'' reliable for factual reporting, but additional considerations may apply and caution should be used. Most of those who commented on ''PinkNews''{{'}} reliability for statements about a person's sexuality said that such claims had to be based on direct quotes from the subject.
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:PinkNews, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="PinkNews"
| ''[[PinkNews]]'' {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:PINKNEWS}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| {{rsnl|305|PinkNews|2020|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2024}}
| There is rough consensus that ''[[PinkNews]]'' is ''generally'' reliable for factual reporting, but additional considerations may apply and caution should be used. Most of those who commented on ''PinkNews''{{'}} reliability for statements about a person's sexuality said that such claims had to be based on direct quotes from the subject.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|pinknews.co.uk}}
|}