{{Shortcut|WP:PLANESPOTTERS}}
{{Infobox
| title = [[Planespotters.net]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Argentina - NO symbol.svg|20px|Generally unreliable|link=]] Generally unreliable: Editors show consensus that the source is [[WP:QUESTIONABLE|questionable]] in most cases.
}}
Although Planespotters.net has been widely used for aviation articles, there is consensus that it is generally unreliable. The website's content is mostly self-published or user-generated, unverified, with many instances of inaccurate reporting.
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 399#Planespotters.net]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 408#Airline fleets- Planespotters.net]]
* [[Talk:Air Transat#Fleet size]]
* [[WT:WikiProject Aviation/Archive 17#Planespotters as reliable source]]
* [[WT:WikiProject Aviation/Archive 23#Planespotters.com again]]
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:Planespotters.net, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gu" id="Planespotters"
| Planespotters.net {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:PLANESPOTTERS}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 399#Planespotters.net|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 408#Airline fleets- Planespotters.net|2]]
[[Talk:Air Transat#Fleet size|A]] [[WT:WikiProject Aviation/Archive 17#Planespotters as reliable source|B]] [[WT:WikiProject Aviation/Archive 23#Planespotters.com again|C]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2023}}
| Although Planespotters.net has been widely used for aviation articles, there is consensus that it is generally unreliable. The website's content is mostly self-published or user-generated, unverified, with many instances of inaccurate reporting.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|planespotters.net}}
|}