<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />

<!-- TODO: Add DISPLAYTITLE back when generating actual pages, with correct URL -->
<!-- {{DISPLAYTITLE:Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/''Playboy''}} -->
{{Infobox
| title            = [[Playboy]]
| image            = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2           = source type
| data2            = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3           = publisher
| data3            = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5           = website
| data5            = 
| label6           = classification
| data6            = [[File:Yes Check Circle.svg|20px]] Usually reliable for typical purposes
}}

There is consensus that ''Playboy'' is generally reliable. Editors note the publication's reputation for high-quality interviews and fact-checking.

== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

<blockquote>''Please add links to other significant discussions.  When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''</blockquote>

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 22#Marjoe Gortner in Oui]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 24#Hustler magazine a reliable source for World Affairs?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 42#Adult industry]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 74#Hustler magazine as a source]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 104#Xrentdvd]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 120#Askmen.com]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 123#Wim Dankbaar – Is this a notability issue or is this a reliable source issue?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 184#wekinglypigs.com]]

* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''

{{DEFAULTSORT:Playboy, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="Playboy"
| ''[[Playboy]]''
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 22#Marjoe Gortner in Oui|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 24#Hustler magazine a reliable source for World Affairs?|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 42#Adult industry|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 74#Hustler magazine as a source|4]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 104#Xrentdvd|5]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 120#Askmen.com|6]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 123#Wim Dankbaar – Is this a notability issue or is this a reliable source issue?|7]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 184#wekinglypigs.com|8]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2015}}
| There is consensus that ''Playboy'' is generally reliable. Editors note the publication's reputation for high-quality interviews and fact-checking.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|playboy.com}}
|}