{{Shortcut|WP:QUILLETTE}}
{{Infobox
| title = [[Quillette]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Argentina - NO symbol.svg|20px|Generally unreliable|link=]] Generally unreliable: Editors show consensus that the source is [[WP:QUESTIONABLE|questionable]] in most cases.
}}
There is consensus that ''Quillette'' is generally unreliable for facts, with non-trivial minorities arguing for either full deprecation or "considerations apply". ''Quillette'' is primarily a publication of opinion, and thus actual usage in articles will usually be a question of whether or not it is [[WP:DUE]] for an attributed opinion rather than whether it is reliable for a factual claim.
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 240#Is Quillette and Spencer Case a reliable source?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 249#"Greviance Studies" scandal – use of peer-reviewed journals as RS]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 271#Quillette]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 353#Expert opinion on Quilette]]
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:Quillette, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gu" id="Quillette"
| ''[[Quillette]]'' {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:QUILLETTE}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu}}
| {{rsnl|314|Quillette|2020|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2021}}
| There is consensus that ''Quillette'' is generally unreliable for facts, with non-trivial minorities arguing for either full deprecation or "considerations apply". ''Quillette'' is primarily a publication of opinion, and thus actual usage in articles will usually be a question of whether or not it is [[WP:DUE]] for an attributed opinion rather than whether it is reliable for a factual claim.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|quillette.com}}
|}