{{Shortcut|WP:RAPPLER}}
{{Infobox
| title = [[Rappler]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Yes Check Circle.svg|20px]] Usually reliable for typical purposes
}}
There is consensus that staff content by Rappler is generally reliable. The IMHO section consists of opinions by readers, and not by paid staff. The defunct x.rappler.com section functioned as a self-published blogging service, and is therefore considered generally unreliable.
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 185#Rappler]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 215#Rappler.com?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 236#Rappler]]
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:Rappler, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="Rappler"
| [[Rappler]] {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:RAPPLER}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 185#Rappler|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 215#Rappler.com?|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 236#Rappler|3]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2018}}
| There is consensus that staff content by Rappler is generally reliable. The IMHO section consists of opinions by readers, and not by paid staff. The defunct x.rappler.com section functioned as a self-published blogging service, and is therefore considered generally unreliable.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|rappler.com}}
|}