{{Shortcut|WP:REASONNEWS}}
{{Infobox
| title = [[Reason (magazine)]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Yes Check Circle.svg|20px]] Usually reliable for typical purposes
}}
There is consensus that ''Reason'' is generally reliable for news and facts. Editors consider ''Reason'' to be a [[WP:BIASED|biased or opinionated source]] that primarily publishes commentary, analysis, and opinion articles. [[WP:RSOPINION|Statements of opinion]] should be [[WP:INTEXT|attributed]] and evaluated for [[WP:DUE|due weight]].
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 200#Reason Magazine at David Lisak]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 291#Reason Magazine and reason.com]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 352#Reason.com]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 500#Reason_(magazine)]]
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:Reason (magazine), Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="Reason"
| {{anchor|RSPREASON}} ''[[Reason (magazine)|Reason]]'' {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:REASONMAGAZINE}} {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:REASONNEWS}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 200#Reason Magazine at David Lisak|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 291#Reason Magazine and reason.com|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 352#Reason.com|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 500#Reason_(magazine)|4]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2025}}
| There is consensus that ''Reason'' is generally reliable for news and facts. Editors consider ''Reason'' to be a [[WP:BIASED|biased or opinionated source]] that primarily publishes commentary, analysis, and opinion articles. [[WP:RSOPINION|Statements of opinion]] should be [[WP:INTEXT|attributed]] and evaluated for [[WP:DUE|due weight]].
| {{WP:RSPUSES|reason.com}}
|}