<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />

    {{Shortcut|WP:RSPREDDIT}}
<!-- TODO: Add DISPLAYTITLE back when generating actual pages, with correct URL -->
<!-- {{DISPLAYTITLE:Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/''Reddit''}} -->
{{Infobox
| title            = [[Reddit]]
| image            = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2           = source type
| data2            = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3           = publisher
| data3            = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5           = website
| data5            = 
| label6           = classification
| data6            = [[File:Argentina - NO symbol.svg|20px|Generally unreliable|link=]] Generally unreliable: Editors show consensus that the source is [[WP:QUESTIONABLE|questionable]] in most cases.
}}

Reddit is a [[social news]] and discussion website. Reddit contains mostly [[WP:UGC|user-generated content]], and is considered both [[WP:SPS|self-published]] and generally unreliable. Interview responses written by [[Account verification|verified]] interviewees on the [[r/IAmA]] subreddit are [[WP:PRIMARY|primary sources]], and editors disagree on their reliability. The policy on the use of [[WP:REDDIT|sources about themselves]] applies.

== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

<blockquote>''Please add links to other significant discussions.  When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''</blockquote>

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 156#Reddit (IAmA)]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 159#Reddit]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 189#Would an answer in a Reddit AMA be admissible as a reliable primary source?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 241#Can reddit comments from article subjects be cited as reliable self-published sources?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 285#Reddit as a source]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 401#Reliability of Reddit comments published by immediate family member of a deceased individual (Technoblade)]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Reddit primary source]]

* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''

{{DEFAULTSORT:Reddit, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gu" id="Reddit"
| | {{anchor|RSPREDDIT}} [[Reddit]] {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:RSREDDIT}} {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:RSPREDDIT}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 156#Reddit (IAmA)|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 159#Reddit|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 189#Would an answer in a Reddit AMA be admissible as a reliable primary source?|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 241#Can reddit comments from article subjects be cited as reliable self-published sources?|4]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 285#Reddit as a source|5]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 401#Reliability of Reddit comments published by immediate family member of a deceased individual (Technoblade)|6]] ''[[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard#Reddit primary source|7]]''
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2026|inprogress=yes}}
| Reddit is a [[social news]] and discussion website. Reddit contains mostly [[WP:UGC|user-generated content]], and is considered both [[WP:SPS|self-published]] and generally unreliable. Interview responses written by [[Account verification|verified]] interviewees on the [[r/IAmA]] subreddit are [[WP:PRIMARY|primary sources]], and editors disagree on their reliability. The policy on the use of [[WP:REDDIT|sources about themselves]] applies.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|reddit.com}}
|}