{{Shortcut|WP:SALON.COM}}
{{Infobox
| title = [[Salon.com]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Achtung-orange.svg|20px|No consensus|link=]] No consensus, unclear, or additional considerations apply
}}
There is no consensus on the reliability of ''Salon''. Editors consider ''Salon'' [[WP:BIASED|biased or opinionated]], and its statements should be [[WP:INTEXT|attributed]].
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:Salon.com, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-nc" id="Salon"
| ''[[Salon.com|Salon]]'' {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:SALON.COM}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|nc}}
| 10{{efn|See these discussions of Salon: [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 1#Salon as a source at a BLP related article under ArbComm special standards|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 34#Salon on Rachel Corrie|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 71#The Israeli "art student" mystery article from salon.com|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 200#Salon.com|4]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 214#Reliability of Salon Newspaper as a Reference on Wikipedia|5]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 235#Salon Newspaper an Opinion website ?|6]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 238#Salon Newspaper an Opinion website ?|7]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 379#Salon.com let misinformation stand for over a year|8]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 386#Are Salon and Decider RS for film reviews?|9]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 398#Use of Salon for pseudoscience article (List of cryptids)|10]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2023}}
| There is no consensus on the reliability of ''Salon''. Editors consider ''Salon'' [[WP:BIASED|biased or opinionated]], and its statements should be [[WP:INTEXT|attributed]].
| {{WP:RSPUSES|salon.com}}
|}