<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />

<!-- TODO: Add DISPLAYTITLE back when generating actual pages, with correct URL -->
<!-- {{DISPLAYTITLE:Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/''ScienceBlogs''}} -->
{{Infobox
| title            = [[ScienceBlogs]]
| image            = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2           = source type
| data2            = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3           = publisher
| data3            = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5           = website
| data5            = 
| label6           = classification
| data6            = [[File:Achtung-orange.svg|20px|No consensus|link=]] No consensus, unclear, or additional considerations apply
}}

ScienceBlogs is an invitation-only network of blogs. There is no consensus on the reliability of ScienceBlogs articles in general. Most editors consider ScienceBlogs articles written by [[WP:EXPERTSOURCE|subject-matter experts]] reliable, though articles outside the writer's relevant field are not. As a [[WP:SPS|self-published source]] it should not be used as a source of information on [[WP:BLPSPS|other living persons]]. Since it often covers [[WP:FRINGE|fringe]] material, [[WP:PARITY|parity of sources]] may be relevant.

== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

<blockquote>''Please add links to other significant discussions.  When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''</blockquote>

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 48#Guardian blog articles]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 58#Scienceblogs.com/Deltoid AKA timlambert.org is not a Reliable Source]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 77#Deep Sea News]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 105#Journal of Cosmology]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 113#Few body systems]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 117#Blog posts and personal websites in the AAH article]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 133#PZ Myers on Stuart Pivar's Lifecode]]

* [[Talk:Energy Catalyzer/Archive 10#'ScienceBlogs' article on the E-Cat]]
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''

{{DEFAULTSORT:ScienceBlogs, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-nc" id="ScienceBlogs"
| [[ScienceBlogs]]
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|nc}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 48#Guardian blog articles|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 58#Scienceblogs.com/Deltoid AKA timlambert.org is not a Reliable Source|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 77#Deep Sea News|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 105#Journal of Cosmology|4]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 113#Few body systems|5]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 117#Blog posts and personal websites in the AAH article|6]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 133#PZ Myers on Stuart Pivar's Lifecode|7]]<br> [[Talk:Energy Catalyzer/Archive 10#'ScienceBlogs' article on the E-Cat|A]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2012}}
| ScienceBlogs is an invitation-only network of blogs. There is no consensus on the reliability of ScienceBlogs articles in general. Most editors consider ScienceBlogs articles written by [[WP:EXPERTSOURCE|subject-matter experts]] reliable, though articles outside the writer's relevant field are not. As a [[WP:SPS|self-published source]] it should not be used as a source of information on [[WP:BLPSPS|other living persons]]. Since it often covers [[WP:FRINGE|fringe]] material, [[WP:PARITY|parity of sources]] may be relevant.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|scienceblogs.com}}
|}