{{Infobox
| title = [[Skeptical Inquirer]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Yes Check Circle.svg|20px]] Usually reliable for typical purposes
}}
A [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 373#Skeptical Inquirer at Arbcom|2022 RfC]] established reasonably clear consensus that ''Skeptical Inquirer'' is generally reliable. [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Proposed decision#Skeptical Inquirer as a reliable source|The Arbitration Committee previously found]] that it is not considered a [[WP:SPS|self-published source]], and that it should be used in a manner similar to other opinion sources.
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 364#Columns at Skeptical Inquirer]]
* [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Proposed decision#Skeptical Inquirer as a reliable source]]
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:Skeptical Inquirer, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="Skeptical Inquirer"
| ''[[Skeptical Inquirer]]''
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| {{rsnl|373|RfC: Skeptical Inquirer|2022|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2022}}
| A [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 373#Skeptical Inquirer at Arbcom|2022 RfC]] established reasonably clear consensus that ''Skeptical Inquirer'' is generally reliable. [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Skepticism and coordinated editing/Proposed decision#Skeptical Inquirer as a reliable source|The Arbitration Committee previously found]] that it is not considered a [[WP:SPS|self-published source]], and that it should be used in a manner similar to other opinion sources.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|skepticalinquirer.org}}
|}