<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />

<!-- TODO: Add DISPLAYTITLE back when generating actual pages, with correct URL -->
<!-- {{DISPLAYTITLE:Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/''Swarajya (magazine)''}} -->
{{Infobox
| title            = [[Swarajya (magazine)]]
| image            = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2           = source type
| data2            = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3           = publisher
| data3            = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5           = website
| data5            = 
| label6           = classification
| data6            = [[File:Argentina - NO symbol.svg|20px|Generally unreliable|link=]] Generally unreliable: Editors show consensus that the source is [[WP:QUESTIONABLE|questionable]] in most cases.
}}

Due to persistent abuse, ''Swarajya'' is on the [[WP:SPB|Wikipedia spam blacklist]], and links must be [[Wikipedia talk:WHITELIST|whitelisted]] before they can be used. ''Swarajya'' is considered generally unreliable due to its poor reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. In the [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 288#OpIndia and Swarajya|2020 discussion]], most editors expressed support for [[WP:DEPREC|deprecating]] ''Swarajya''. Editors consider the publication [[WP:BIASED|biased or opinionated]]. ''Swarajya'' was formerly the parent publication of {{pslink|OpIndia}}, and frequently republishes content from OpIndia under the "Swarajya Staff" [[byline]]. ''See also: {{pslink|OpIndia}}.''

== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

<blockquote>''Please add links to other significant discussions.  When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''</blockquote>

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 278#I searched for Swarajya magzine in archives or its reliability but cannot find either.]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 288#OpIndia and Swarajya]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 347#Laundering Swarajya and citing opinion articles]]

* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''

{{DEFAULTSORT:Swarajya (magazine), Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-b" id="Swarajya"
| ''[[Swarajya (magazine)|Swarajya]]''
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu|b=y}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 278#I searched for Swarajya magzine in archives or its reliability but cannot find either.|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 288#OpIndia and Swarajya|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 347#Laundering Swarajya and citing opinion articles|3]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2021}}
| Due to persistent abuse, ''Swarajya'' is on the [[WP:SPB|Wikipedia spam blacklist]], and links must be [[Wikipedia talk:WHITELIST|whitelisted]] before they can be used. ''Swarajya'' is considered generally unreliable due to its poor reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. In the [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 288#OpIndia and Swarajya|2020 discussion]], most editors expressed support for [[WP:DEPREC|deprecating]] ''Swarajya''. Editors consider the publication [[WP:BIASED|biased or opinionated]]. ''Swarajya'' was formerly the parent publication of {{pslink|OpIndia}}, and frequently republishes content from OpIndia under the "Swarajya Staff" [[byline]]. ''See also: {{pslink|OpIndia}}.''
| {{WP:RSPUSES|swarajyamag.com}}
|}