{{Shortcut|WP:TASS}}
{{Infobox
| title = [[TASS]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label1 = other names
| data1 = ITAR-TASS, Telegraph Agency of the Soviet Union, Information Telegraph Agency of Russia
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Argentina - NO symbol.svg|20px|Generally unreliable|link=]] Generally unreliable: Editors show consensus that the source is [[WP:QUESTIONABLE|questionable]] in most cases.
}}
A previous [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 260#RfC: TASS|2019 RfC]] had concluded that reliability is unclear or additional considerations apply.
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 370#Use of TASS for Ukranian refugee figures]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 377#TASS, Interfax (russian version) and RIA Novosti's reliability on the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine (especially on alleged attacks in Russia)]]
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:TASS, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gu" id="TASS"
| [[TASS]] (ITAR-TASS, Telegraph Agency of the Soviet Union, Information Telegraph Agency of Russia) {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:TASS}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu}}
| {{rsnl|260|RfC: TASS|2019|rfc=y}} {{rsnl|378|RfC on TASS|2022|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2022}}
| In a 2022 RfC, editors achieved a strong consensus that TASS is a [[WP:BIASED|biased]] source with respect to topics in which the Russian government may have an interest and that the source is generally unreliable for providing contentious facts in that context. Editors attained a rough consensus that TASS should not be deprecated at this time and a rough consensus that TASS is generally unreliable more broadly for facts, with the caveat that it is considered reliable for quotes of statements made by the Kremlin, the Russian State, and pro-Kremlin politicians.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|tass.com|tass.ru}}
|}