<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />

    {{Shortcut|WP:TECHCRUNCH}}
<!-- TODO: Add DISPLAYTITLE back when generating actual pages, with correct URL -->
<!-- {{DISPLAYTITLE:Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/''TechCrunch''}} -->
{{Infobox
| title            = [[TechCrunch]]
| image            = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2           = source type
| data2            = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3           = publisher
| data3            = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5           = website
| data5            = 
| label6           = classification
| data6            = [[File:Achtung-orange.svg|20px|No consensus|link=]] No consensus, unclear, or additional considerations apply
}}

Careful consideration should be given to whether a piece is written by staff or as a part of their blog, as well as whether the piece/writer may have a conflict of interest, and to what extent they rely on public relations material from their subject for their writing. TechCrunch may be useful for satisfying [[WP:V|verifiability]], though their articles often have too little independent analysis to satisfy [[WP:CORPDEPTH]].

== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

<blockquote>''Please add links to other significant discussions.  When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''</blockquote>

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 110#TechCrunch and Engadget]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 87#techcrunch.com]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221#Are news articles written by TechCrunch staff considered RS?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 246#Is TechCrunch a reliable source?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 486#TechCrunch, VentureBeat, and Business Insider]]

* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''

{{DEFAULTSORT:TechCrunch, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-nc" id="TechCrunch"
| [[TechCrunch]] {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:TECHCRUNCH}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|nc}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 110#TechCrunch and Engadget|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 87#techcrunch.com|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221#Are news articles written by TechCrunch staff considered RS?|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 246#Is TechCrunch a reliable source?|4]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 486#TechCrunch, VentureBeat, and Business Insider|5]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2025}}
| Careful consideration should be given to whether a piece is written by staff or as a part of their blog, as well as whether the piece/writer may have a conflict of interest, and to what extent they rely on public relations material from their subject for their writing. TechCrunch may be useful for satisfying [[WP:V|verifiability]], though their articles often have too little independent analysis to satisfy [[WP:CORPDEPTH]].
| {{WP:RSPUSES|techcrunch.com}}
|}