{{Infobox
| title = [[The Canary (website)]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Argentina - NO symbol.svg|20px|Generally unreliable|link=]] Generally unreliable: Editors show consensus that the source is [[WP:QUESTIONABLE|questionable]] in most cases.
}}
There is consensus that ''The Canary'' is generally unreliable. Its reporting is sensationalist at times; selective reporting, a left-wing bias, and a poor distinction between editorial and news content were also noted.
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 245#Is the Canary a reliable source?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 274#Seeking acceptance of reliability of UK progressive online only news sites – The Canary, Evolve Politics and Skwawkbox]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 292#The Canary]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 321#The Canary]]
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:Canary, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- id="The Canary" class="s-gu"
| data-sort-value="Canary" | ''[[The Canary (website)|The Canary]]''
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gu}}
| {{rsnl|335|RfC: The Canary (closed)|2021|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2021}}
| There is consensus that ''The Canary'' is generally unreliable. Its reporting is sensationalist at times; selective reporting, a left-wing bias, and a poor distinction between editorial and news content were also noted.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|thecanary.co}}
|}