{{Shortcut|WP:THECONVERSATION}}
{{Infobox
| title = [[The Conversation (website)]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Yes Check Circle.svg|20px]] Usually reliable for typical purposes
}}
''The Conversation'' publishes articles from academics who are [[subject-matter experts]]. It is generally reliable for subjects in the authors' [[areas of expertise]]. Opinions published in ''The Conversation'' should be handled with [[WP:RSOPINION]].
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 99#The Conversation (website)]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 169#The Conversation]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 275#theconversation.com]]
* [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 490#The Conversation on the FBI]]
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:Conversation, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="The Conversation"
| data-sort-value="Conversation" | ''[[The Conversation (website)|The Conversation]]'' {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:THECONVERSATION}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 99#The Conversation (website)|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 169#The Conversation|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 275#theconversation.com|3]] [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 490#The Conversation on the FBI|4]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2025}}
| ''The Conversation'' publishes articles from academics who are [[subject-matter experts]]. It is generally reliable for subjects in the authors' [[areas of expertise]]. Opinions published in ''The Conversation'' should be handled with [[WP:RSOPINION]].
| {{WP:RSPUSES|theconversation.com}}
|}