{{Shortcut|WP:THEDIPLOMAT}}
{{Infobox
| title = [[The Diplomat (magazine)]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Yes Check Circle.svg|20px]] Usually reliable for typical purposes
}}
There is consensus that ''The Diplomat'' is generally reliable. Opinion pieces should be evaluated by [[WP:RSOPINION]] and [[WP:NEWSBLOG]]. Some editors have expressed concern on their reliability for North Korea-related topics.
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 193#The Diplomat]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 298#thediplomat.com]]
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:Diplomat, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="The Diplomat"
| data-sort-value="Diplomat" | ''[[The Diplomat (magazine)|The Diplomat]]'' {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:THEDIPLOMAT}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 193#The Diplomat|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 298#thediplomat.com|2]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2020}}
| There is consensus that ''The Diplomat'' is generally reliable. Opinion pieces should be evaluated by [[WP:RSOPINION]] and [[WP:NEWSBLOG]]. Some editors have expressed concern on their reliability for North Korea-related topics.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|thediplomat.com}}
|}