<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />

    {{Shortcut|WP:EPOCHTIMES}}
<!-- TODO: Add DISPLAYTITLE back when generating actual pages, with correct URL -->
<!-- {{DISPLAYTITLE:Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/''The Epoch Times''}} -->
{{Infobox
| title            = [[The Epoch Times]]
| image            = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label1           = other names
| data1            = New Tang Dynasty Television, Vision Times, Vision China Times
| label2           = source type
| data2            = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3           = publisher
| data3            = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5           = website
| data5            = 
| label6           = classification
| data6            = [[File:Stop hand.svg|20px|Deprecated|link=]] '''Deprecated''': There is community consensus to [[WP:DEPS|deprecate]] the source.
}}

''The Epoch Times'' was deprecated in the 2019 RfC. Most editors classify ''The Epoch Times'' as an advocacy group for the [[Falun Gong]], and consider the publication a [[WP:BIASED|biased or opinionated source]] that frequently publishes [[conspiracy theory|conspiracy theories]] as fact.

== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

<blockquote>''Please add links to other significant discussions.  When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''</blockquote>

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 15#The Epoch Times]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 19#Is "The Epoch Times" a reliable source]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 34#The Epoch Times]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 191#Epoch Times for story on Monsanto lawsuit]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 251#The Epoch Times for anything related to political controversies involving Falun Gong]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 294#Should we be using this Falun Gong media outfit as a source for BLPs, politics, China, etc?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 295#Expert interview in Epoch Times spinoff channel]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 376#Are NTD and vision times legit source?]]

* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''

{{DEFAULTSORT:Epoch Times, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-d" id="The Epoch Times"
| data-sort-value="Epoch Times" | ''[[The Epoch Times]]'' <small>([[New Tang Dynasty Television]], ''[[Vision Times]]'', ''[[Vision China Times]]'')</small> {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:EPOCHTIMES}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|d}}
| {{rsnl|279|The Epoch Times, once again|2019|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2022|stale=n}}
| ''The Epoch Times'' was deprecated in the 2019 RfC. Most editors classify ''The Epoch Times'' as an advocacy group for the [[Falun Gong]], and consider the publication a [[WP:BIASED|biased or opinionated source]] that frequently publishes [[conspiracy theory|conspiracy theories]] as fact.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|theepochtimes.com|epochtimes.com|ntd.com|ntdtv.com|ntdtv.ca|ntdtv.com.tw|epoch.org.il|epoch-archive.com|epochtimes.fr|epochtimes.cz|epochtimes.de|epochtimes.co.kr|epochtimes.co.il|epochtimes.it|epochtimes.ru|epochtimes.se|epochtimes-romania.com|etindonesia.com|nspirement.com|secretchina.com|trithucvn.net|vibrantdot.co|visiontimes.com|visiontimes.fr|visiontimesjp.com|visiontimes.com.au}}
|}