{{Infobox
| title = [[The Green Papers]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Achtung-orange.svg|20px|No consensus|link=]] No consensus, unclear, or additional considerations apply
}}
There is no consensus on the reliability of ''The Green Papers''. As a [[WP:SPS|self-published source]] that publishes [[United States election]] results, some editors question the site's editorial oversight.
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 206#The Green Papers]]
* [[Talk:2020 Iowa Democratic caucuses/Archive 1#Poll: Should The Green Papers estimates for pledged delegates be used in place of those from major sources like the New York Times?]]
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:Green Papers, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-nc" id="The Green Papers"
| data-sort-value="Green Papers" | ''[[The Green Papers]]''
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|nc}}
| {{rsnl|290|RfC: Is The Green Papers a generally reliable source for reporting election-related information?|2020|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2020}}
| There is no consensus on the reliability of ''The Green Papers''. As a [[WP:SPS|self-published source]] that publishes [[United States election]] results, some editors question the site's editorial oversight.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|thegreenpapers.com}}
|}