{{Shortcut|WP:MAILONSUNDAY}}
{{Infobox
| title = [[The Mail on Sunday]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Stop hand.svg|20px|Deprecated|link=]] '''Deprecated''': There is community consensus to [[WP:DEPS|deprecate]] the source.
}}
There is clear and substantial consensus that the ''Mail on Sunday'' is generally unreliable, and a slightly narrower consensus that the source should be deprecated. Those supporting deprecation point to factual errors, asserted fabrications, and biased reporting identified on the part of the source, with reference to specific instances, and to common ownership of the source with [[#Daily Mail|a previously deprecated source]].
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 278#Does WP:Dailymail apply to the Mail on Sunday]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 311#Clarification: Does Daily Mail RfC apply to the Mail on Sunday?]]
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:Mail on Sunday, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-d" id="The Mail on Sunday"
| data-sort-value="Mail on Sunday" | ''[[The Mail on Sunday]]'' {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:MAILONSUNDAY}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|d}}
| {{rsnl|318|Can we please adapt the Daily Mail consensus to reflect a position on Mail on Sunday?|2020|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2020|stale=n}}
| There is clear and substantial consensus that the ''Mail on Sunday'' is generally unreliable, and a slightly narrower consensus that the source should be deprecated. Those supporting deprecation point to factual errors, asserted fabrications, and biased reporting identified on the part of the source, with reference to specific instances, and to common ownership of the source with [[#Daily Mail|a previously deprecated source]].
| {{WP:RSPUSES|mailonsunday.co.uk|mailonsunday.com|pressreader.com/uk/the-mail-on-sunday|pressreader.com/uk/the-scottish-mail-on-sunday|dailymail.co.uk/mailonsunday}}
|}