<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />

    {{Shortcut|WP:THENATION}}
<!-- TODO: Add DISPLAYTITLE back when generating actual pages, with correct URL -->
<!-- {{DISPLAYTITLE:Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/''The Nation''}} -->
{{Infobox
| title            = [[The Nation]]
| image            = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2           = source type
| data2            = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3           = publisher
| data3            = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5           = website
| data5            = 
| label6           = classification
| data6            = [[File:Yes Check Circle.svg|20px]] Usually reliable for typical purposes
}}

There is consensus that ''The Nation'' is generally reliable. In the "About" section of their website, they identify as progressive. Most editors consider ''The Nation'' a [[WP:PARTISAN|partisan source]] whose statements should be [[WP:INTEXT|attributed]]. The publication's [[WP:RSOPINION|opinion pieces]] should be handled with the appropriate guideline. Take care to ensure that content from ''The Nation'' constitutes [[WP:DUE|due weight]] in the article and conforms to the [[WP:BLP|biographies of living persons]] policy.

== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

<blockquote>''Please add links to other significant discussions.  When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''</blockquote>

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 5#The Nation]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 9#The Nation article re: Daniel Pipes]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 11#Further Discussion of the Nation]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 30#Article about William Timmons in The Nation]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 39#Is The Nation a reliable source?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 40#The Nation]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 283#The Nation]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 305#Is The Nation reliable for claims about the Douma Chemical attack?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 371#The nation]]

* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''

{{DEFAULTSORT:Nation, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="The Nation"
| data-sort-value="Nation"| ''[[The Nation]]'' {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:THENATION}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 5#The Nation|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 9#The Nation article re: Daniel Pipes|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 11#Further Discussion of the Nation|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 30#Article about William Timmons in The Nation|4]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 39#Is The Nation a reliable source?|5]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 40#The Nation|6]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 283#The Nation|7]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 305#Is The Nation reliable for claims about the Douma Chemical attack?|8]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 371#The nation|9]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2022}}
| There is consensus that ''The Nation'' is generally reliable. In the "About" section of their website, they identify as progressive. Most editors consider ''The Nation'' a [[WP:PARTISAN|partisan source]] whose statements should be [[WP:INTEXT|attributed]]. The publication's [[WP:RSOPINION|opinion pieces]] should be handled with the appropriate guideline. Take care to ensure that content from ''The Nation'' constitutes [[WP:DUE|due weight]] in the article and conforms to the [[WP:BLP|biographies of living persons]] policy.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|thenation.com}}
|}