{{Shortcut|WP:UNZ}}
{{Infobox
| title = [[The Unz Review]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Stop hand.svg|20px|Deprecated|link=]] '''Deprecated''': There is community consensus to [[WP:DEPS|deprecate]] the source.
}}
''The Unz Review'' was deprecated by [[WP:SNOWPRO|WP:SnowPro]] consensus in the 2021 RfC. Editors cite racist, antisemitic, pseudoscientific and fringe content. The site's extensive archive of journal reprints includes many apparent [[WP:COPYLINK|copyright violations]].
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 349#The Unz Review]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 435#break (Syndication in Unz Review)]]
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:Unz Review, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-d" id="The Unz Review"
| data-sort-value="Unz Review" | {{anchor|Unz|Unz Review}} ''[[The Unz Review]]'' {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:UNZ}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|d}}
| {{rsnl|356|The Unz Review|2021|rfc=y}}
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2024}}
| ''The Unz Review'' was deprecated by [[WP:SNOWPRO|WP:SnowPro]] consensus in the 2021 RfC. Editors cite racist, antisemitic, pseudoscientific and fringe content. The site's extensive archive of journal reprints includes many apparent [[WP:COPYLINK|copyright violations]].
| {{WP:RSPUSES|unz.com|unz.org}}
|}