<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />

    {{Shortcut|WP:WSJ}}
<!-- TODO: Add DISPLAYTITLE back when generating actual pages, with correct URL -->
<!-- {{DISPLAYTITLE:Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/''The Wall Street Journal''}} -->
{{Infobox
| title            = [[The Wall Street Journal]]
| image            = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label1           = other names
| data1            = WSJ
| label2           = source type
| data2            = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3           = publisher
| data3            = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5           = website
| data5            = 
| label6           = classification
| data6            = [[File:Yes Check Circle.svg|20px]] Usually reliable for typical purposes
}}

Most editors consider ''The Wall Street Journal'' generally reliable for news. Use [[WP:NEWSBLOG]] to evaluate the newspaper's blogs, including Washington Wire. Use [[WP:RSOPINION]] for opinion pieces.

== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

<blockquote>''Please add links to other significant discussions.  When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''</blockquote>

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 48#Alleged Wall Street Journal Publication]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 80#Washington Wire by WSJ?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 96#Wall Street Journal is usually bogus]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 180#Wall Street Journal "Saturday Essay"]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 273#Dubious report by the Wall Street Journal]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 407#Wall Street Journal opinions]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 448#WSJ says it can't prove claims that 10% of UNWRA staff had ties to militant groups]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 488#Did WSJ fall for a hoax?]]

* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''

{{DEFAULTSORT:Wall Street Journal, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="The Wall Street Journal"
| data-sort-value="Wall Street Journal" | ''[[The Wall Street Journal]]'' <small>(''WSJ'')</small> {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:WSJ}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 48#Alleged Wall Street Journal Publication|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 80#Washington Wire by WSJ?|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 96#Wall Street Journal is usually bogus|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 180#Wall Street Journal "Saturday Essay"|4]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 273#Dubious report by the Wall Street Journal|5]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 407#Wall Street Journal opinions|6]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 448#WSJ says it can't prove claims that 10% of UNWRA staff had ties to militant groups|7]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 488#Did WSJ fall for a hoax?|8]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2025}}
| Most editors consider ''The Wall Street Journal'' generally reliable for news. Use [[WP:NEWSBLOG]] to evaluate the newspaper's blogs, including Washington Wire. Use [[WP:RSOPINION]] for opinion pieces.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|wsj.com}}
|}