{{Shortcut|WP:WAPO}}
{{Infobox
| title = [[The Washington Post]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label1 = other names
| data1 = The Post, WaPo, TWP
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Yes Check Circle.svg|20px]] Usually reliable for typical purposes
}}
Most editors consider ''The Washington Post'' generally reliable. Some editors note that [[WP:NEWSBLOG]] should be used to evaluate blog posts on ''The Washington Post'''s website.
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:Washington Post, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="The Washington Post"
| data-sort-value="Washington Post" | ''[[The Washington Post]]'' (''The Post'', ''WaPo'', ''TWP'') {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:WAPO}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| 20{{efn|See these discussions of ''The Washington Post'':
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2024}}
| Most editors consider ''The Washington Post'' generally reliable. Some editors note that [[WP:NEWSBLOG]] should be used to evaluate blog posts on ''The Washington Post'''s website.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|washingtonpost.com}}
|}