{{Shortcut|WP:USWEEKLY}}
{{Infobox
| title = [[Us Weekly]]
| image = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2 = source type
| data2 = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3 = publisher
| data3 = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5 = website
| data5 =
| label6 = classification
| data6 = [[File:Achtung-orange.svg|20px|No consensus|link=]] No consensus, unclear, or additional considerations apply
}}
There is no consensus on the reliability of ''Us Weekly''. It is often considered less reliable than ''{{pslink|People}}'' magazine. ''See also: {{pslink|People}}''
== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}
''Please add links to other significant discussions. When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 10#accesshollywood – Reliable source?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 112#US Weekly and People magazine]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 168#US Weekly]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 170#Celebrity sources and distinguishing tabloid (newspaper format) from tabloid journalism]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 238#Absence of evidence as evidence of absence]]
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''
{{DEFAULTSORT:Us Weekly, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}
==References==
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-nc" id="US Weekly"
| ''[[Us Weekly]]'' {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:USWEEKLY}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|nc}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 10#accesshollywood – Reliable source?|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 112#US Weekly and People magazine|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 168#US Weekly|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 170#Celebrity sources and distinguishing tabloid (newspaper format) from tabloid journalism|4]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 238#Absence of evidence as evidence of absence|5]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2018}}
| There is no consensus on the reliability of ''Us Weekly''. It is often considered less reliable than ''{{pslink|People}}'' magazine. ''See also: {{pslink|People}}''
| {{WP:RSPUSES|usmagazine.com}}
|}