<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />

    {{Shortcut|WP:VENTUREBEAT}}
<!-- TODO: Add DISPLAYTITLE back when generating actual pages, with correct URL -->
<!-- {{DISPLAYTITLE:Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/''VentureBeat''}} -->
{{Infobox
| title            = [[VentureBeat]]
| image            = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label2           = source type
| data2            = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3           = publisher
| data3            = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5           = website
| data5            = 
| label6           = classification
| data6            = [[File:Achtung-orange.svg|20px|No consensus|link=]] No consensus, unclear, or additional considerations apply
}}

There is no consensus on the reliability of VentureBeat. Some editors expressed concern over the site's publication of [[churnalism]] and AI-generated articles, and argued against using the site to establish [[WP:N|notability]]. WikiProject Video games has [[WP:VG/S#General gaming|classified VentureBeat]] as generally reliable for its coverage of video games.

== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

<blockquote>''Please add links to other significant discussions.  When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''</blockquote>

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 105#VentureBeat]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 482#Reevaluating VentureBeat: Churnalism, notability and AI use]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 486#TechCrunch, VentureBeat, and Business Insider]]

* [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 12#Venturebeat/Gamesbeat]]
* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''

{{DEFAULTSORT:VentureBeat, Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-nc" id="VentureBeat"
| [[VentureBeat]] {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:VENTUREBEAT}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|nc}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 105#VentureBeat|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 482#Reevaluating VentureBeat: Churnalism, notability and AI use|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 486#TechCrunch, VentureBeat, and Business Insider|3]]<br> [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Sources/Archive 12#Venturebeat/Gamesbeat|A]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2025}}
| There is no consensus on the reliability of VentureBeat. Some editors expressed concern over the site's publication of [[churnalism]] and AI-generated articles, and argued against using the site to establish [[WP:N|notability]]. WikiProject Video games has [[WP:VG/S#General gaming|classified VentureBeat]] as generally reliable for its coverage of video games.
| {{WP:RSPUSES|venturebeat.com}}
|}