<templatestyles src="Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/styles.css" />

    {{Shortcut|WP:RSPVOX}}
<!-- TODO: Add DISPLAYTITLE back when generating actual pages, with correct URL -->
<!-- {{DISPLAYTITLE:Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/all/''Vox (website)''}} -->
{{Infobox
| title            = [[Vox (website)]]
| image            = [[File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg|100px|alt=logo]] ''(not part of original row)''
| label1           = other names
| data1            = Recode
| label2           = source type
| data2            = foobar ''(not part of original row)''
| label3           = publisher
| data3            = Fooland (state-funded media) ''(not part of original row)''
| label5           = website
| data5            = 
| label6           = classification
| data6            = [[File:Yes Check Circle.svg|20px]] Usually reliable for typical purposes
}}

''Vox'' is considered generally reliable. Some editors say that ''Vox'' is a [[WP:PARTISAN|partisan source]] in the field of politics or that it does not always clearly delineate reporting and opinion content. ''See also: {{pslink|Polygon (pre-2025)}}, {{pslink|The Verge}}, {{pslink|New York}} ''

== Prior discussions ==
{{WP:RSPLinks}}

<blockquote>''Please add links to other significant discussions.  When in doubt, read and rely on the discussions themselves, rather than the simple summary.''</blockquote>

* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 170#is quoting someone's calculations based on four year old outdated information allowed?]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 181#Huffington Post and Vox and WP:BLP]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 219#Vox.com and Huffington Post at Smith & Wesson M&P15]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 285#Vox article containing a factually wrong claim is used in an article]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 362#Vox revisited]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 388#Vox]]
* [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 441#OpenAI "content and product partnerships" with Vox Media and The Atlantic]]

* Simple summary of prior discussions: '''TBD'''

{{DEFAULTSORT:Vox (website), Perennial sources}}
==Notes==
{{notelist}}

==References==
<references />
== Original table row for comparison ==
''(remove this when this source page is ready to go live)''
{{Wikipedia:RSPTableHeader}}
|- class="s-gr" id="Vox"
| ''[[Vox (website)|Vox]]'' <small>(''[[Recode]]'')</small> {{WP:RSPSHORTCUT|WP:RSPVOX}}
| {{WP:RSPSTATUS|gr}}
| [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 170#is quoting someone's calculations based on four year old outdated information allowed?|1]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 181#Huffington Post and Vox and WP:BLP|2]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 219#Vox.com and Huffington Post at Smith & Wesson M&P15|3]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 285#Vox article containing a factually wrong claim is used in an article|4]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 362#Vox revisited|5]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 388#Vox|6]] [[WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 441#OpenAI "content and product partnerships" with Vox Media and The Atlantic|7]]
| {{WP:RSPLAST|2024}}
| ''Vox'' is considered generally reliable. Some editors say that ''Vox'' is a [[WP:PARTISAN|partisan source]] in the field of politics or that it does not always clearly delineate reporting and opinion content. ''See also: {{pslink|Polygon (pre-2025)}}, {{pslink|The Verge}}, {{pslink|New York}} ''
| {{WP:RSPUSES|vox.com}}
|}